An Al Qeada Handbook instructs adherents how to make false claims of abuse and offenses against Islam if captured by Coalition forces.
In a raid on an al-Qaida cell in Manchester, British officials obtained al-Qaida`s most extensive manual for how to wage war, the Washington Times said Tuesday. A directive lists one mission as "spreading rumors and writing statements that instigate people against the enemy."
If captured, the manual states, "At the beginning of the trial ... the brothers must insist on proving that torture was inflicted on them by state security before the judge. Complain of mistreatment while in prison."
The American Civil Liberties Union is cooperating with the Terrorist's strategy handily. Last week they posted 2002 FBI documents regarding unfounded accusations from suspected al Qaeda and Taliban detainees at the detention center. The pro-terrorist organization had won a court decision that forced the administration to release scores of e-mails between agents who had interviewed captives.
Yet according to the Navy Inspector General, only three substantiated cases of minor abuse at Gitmo were found in over 24 thousand interrogations. Vice Adm. Albert T. Church III's report was released in March.
4 comments:
I guess the fact that they're being held with no charges pending for years is fine. As long as they're not being 'abused'. Funny way you have of looking at that.
As opposed to being an innocent bystander blown up by suicide bombers? Or a western contractor trying to earn a living rebuilding Iraq's infrastructure being kidnapped and beheaded because he's not a muslim?
Most of the Guitmo detainees were caught in combat, with weapons at hand, trying to kill coalition soldiers. I know the ACLU doesn't recognize the concept of "caught in the act" as an implication of guilt, but it should be blazingly obvious to anyone smart enough to learn how to type and use the internet.
The issue here is that false accusations are a weapon of the enemy, and are WILLINGLY being used as Anti-Western propaganda by traitorous elements in our society.
Which side Right or Wrong? Use this yardstick:
"The conflict between the West and Islam will be over when it is just as safe and easy to open a synagogue in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, as it is now to open a mosque in Dearborn, Michigan.
...Don't hold your breath"
Jack Rich, 12/05/03
to quote "anonymous"
[i]I guess the fact that they're being held with no charges pending for years is fine. As long as they're not being 'abused'. Funny way you have of looking at that.[/i]
They wouldn't have to be held in this manner if it weren't for criminal's-rights activist organizations like the ACLU. The Gitmo detainees who were released all rushed back to the Middle-East proclaiming how'd they'd fooled the Americans into thinking they're innocent.
Most of the detainees were caught in combat, weapons in hand? Care to site sources for that? Perhaps you're privy to the 'secret information' the US government had when they seized Maher Arar and shipped him for ten months to Saudi Arabia? Was he caught in the act? Did he have weapon in hand? I know he's listed as a Canadian but when you see pictures, he doesn't really look Canadian. I mean, he looks Middle Eastern which pretty much makes him suspect anyway, right?
Excellent. We don't need trials and courts if we have people who are smart enough to learn how to type and use the internet.
Answer me this; If the evidence is that clear cut, why have they not been charged? If anyone who can learn to type and use the internet is capable of seeing that they're guilty, why not try them, sentence them, hell execute them if that's the answer?
Post a Comment